Categories
12. A Framwork For A General System Theory

Framework For A General System Theory

This paper, freely downloadable at https://rational-understanding.com/UUDH#framework, presents a comprehensive framework for understanding systems across all domains of complexity: physical, biological, cognitive, and social. The framework builds upon, unifies, and extends classical systems science by grounding systemic behaviour in open system thermodynamics, energy landscapes, systems causality, and recursive emergence. At its core lies the concept of information at source: a measure of internal recursively structured order, and its dynamic relationship with energy and entropy.

Systems are defined by the emergence of properties absent from their components, and their operation depends on the balance between energy available for maintaining internal structure and that required for exercising function. The framework explains how systems form, persist, collapse, or evolve by stabilising in attractor basins within energy landscapes, scaling recursively through fractal architecture.

Sets of formal definitions and propositions, whose provenance is given, underpin the theory, offering a structured, logically coherent, and cross-disciplinary model. The framework unifies foundational work by von Bertalanffy, Ashby, Beer, Bateson, Prigogine, Rosen, and others. It also incorporates more recent developments by Bhaskar, Cronin and Walker, Parisi, and the author.

6 replies on “Framework For A General System Theory”

Hi John,

Do you think that defining system in plain english terms is sufficient, or would you ever consider attempting to define “system” more formally in set or graph theoretic terms?

A brief skim led me very excited to dig into this as a useful conceptual synthesis, but I did get hung up on this point.

Best, Shingai

Like

Hi Shingai,
I’m trying to reach a general audience and have to define a system in plain English, therefore. However, there is absolutely no reason why it shouldn’t be defined more formally for those who would find that helpful. The basic propositions are: every system is a subset of other systems; every system is a super-set of other systems; every system has properties that its component systems do not; every system haas a process or processes; and every system has inputs and outputs that are also systems. All of these propositions can be expressed in natural language, symbolic logic, or graphically – providing one understands the conventions used. A point worth noting though is that formalised expressions are always ultimately founded on sensory imagery and/or natural language.
With best wishes,
John

Like

Hi John,

This makes sense to me, for the most part.

By general audience, do you mean you are trying to reach a group of people who might not necessarily be interested in theory development/formalization, but who might be beneficiaries of a theory once it is developed?

Like

Hi Shingai, yes that’s correct. There is a lot of work to do to fully understand open system thermodynamics. However, systems that are open to energy but closed to mass are covered by the theory as it stands and our planet approximates to that type of system. This means that there are potential benefits to be gained right now and I am going to look into that next. George was very helpful in that regard. With best wishes, John.

Like

[…] A system can be closed; that is, no energy or matter enters or leaves it; open to energy; or open to both energy and matter. The nature of the landscape differs for each. This is explained in more detail in the paper “Framework for a General System Theory” (Challoner, 2025) available at https://rational-understanding.com/2025/05/12/framework-for-a-general-system-theory/. […]

Like

Leave a reply to Shingai Thornton Cancel reply